FREE FLIGHT 1983 #1 p21 BLUENOSE CHECKOUT PROCEDURE TRANSITION TO THE ‘HOT ASTIR' Since club gliders of higher performance level will be appearing at Canadian gliderports in the future, we would like to share with you our check procedures for pilots transitioning to these ships: 1. For the pilot moving up from K-8 type machinery, the first few flights should be done in calm air The rate of acceleration once the nose is lowered is pretty dramatic. We put our pilots in the glider, canopy down, and raise the tail to how the small angular change between 50 and 80 knots 2. The nature of the forward visibility during final should be carefully discussed The change in fuselage shape that came with the Open Cirrus era changed the downward and forward visibility in a significant way. If a pilot in the Astir tries to get the same expansive amount of real estate that is visible downwards and ahead from the front seat of the Ka-7, for instance, he will have 80 knots on the clock in no time. Once this is seen, the tendency is to correct by hastily pulling back on the stick. The runway then disappears out of sight under the nose The pilot hurriedly lowers the nose and he is back up to 70 knots or so. This combination has him in PlO (Pilot Induced Oscillation) territory with the runway fast approaching. This aspect of the forward view is carefully explained with the precaution that one has to expect and accept a reduced forward-downward view. 3. The wing-tips are much closer to the ground than those of the Ka-7, K-8, or 2-22 and thus the roll attitude has to be carefully monitored. This was demonstrated by alternately touching the wing-tips to the ground with the pilot in the cockpit. 4. Checkout flights were performed in the Ka-7 in turbulent conditions to see if the pilot reacted to every bump or if he reacted only to those that changed attitude. This check was suggested to us by Ian Oldaker, and was helpful in identifying pilots who might have “pitch-twitch trouble. 5. The wheel-brake is at the end of the dive-brake handle travel, If the pilot over-enthusiastically tries to pin the glider on the ground at touch-down (tempting on the second or third touch down on the bounced landing), he can tip the glider over on its nose. 6. The relationship between the angle-of-incidence of the wing and the angle-at-rest offered by the undercarriage is such that the aircraft touches down well above stall even if fully held off. Thus, a bump, gust, or abrupt stick movement can have the ship flying again It was pointed out that the “waiting-for-takeoff” view of the horizon and the “waiting-for-touch-down” view were identical. 7. It was also pointed out that the higher touch down speed mentioned above plus the low rolling friction of an aft c/g sailplane equipped with a pneumatic tail wheel results in a somewhat longer-than-expected roll out. 8. The crosswind/aft cg situation was explained, and check flights were done in a Ka-7 to ensure that the pilot could land in a 70 to 90 degree cross wind (a typical situation at Stanley) with no drift at touch down. This has so far proved to be less a problem than anticipated. Recently, a pilot landed the aircraft in a right-to-left 70 degree crosswind of 10 knots, while being forced to the extreme right of runway 27 by a power plane taxiing on the left. This caused the right wing to mow down the taller greenery in the infield. Even this combination did not cause difficulty during roll out. George Graham